Sinking Ship Plan: The Self-Escape of a Faithless Empire

In a political system that has rejected faith and denied morality from its very birth, collapse is not accidental, but an inevitable physiological response. A regime that neither believes in deities nor in human nature, only in the continuation of power itself, cannot make decisions oriented toward the future—only toward immediate security and survival; it does not plan the fate of a society, but designs a survival mechanism. The so-called "sinking ship plan" is precisely the logical endpoint of this: when the ruling group realizes the system can no longer be updated, can no longer repair itself, they begin searching for escape routes for themselves.

⸻

This escape does not require conspiratorial documents or coordinated plans; it is a systematic instinct. When the state machinery loses its capacity to generate vitality, when fiscal dependence is overdrawn, when social trust has collapsed, the behavior of everyone within the system automatically converges toward the same goal—how to ensure the safety of oneself and one's family. When this instinct spreads throughout society, the so-called "nation" becomes an empty shell: every individual silently searches for their own exit, while no one repairs the holes in the ship's hull.

⸻

Communist-style regimes were from the beginning built on anti-faith logic. They negate religion, negate individual conscience, negate any judgment standard above power. Their legitimacy does not come from morality, but from the capacity for control. They can manufacture fear, incite hatred, distribute benefits, but they cannot make people believe in the future, because the future does not exist within such a system. The future is merely a slogan repeatedly borrowed to delay the time of collapse. When external conditions are favorable, it can use global capital and market order to maintain stability; when conditions deteriorate, it turns to blockade and purge to reduce the spread of turmoil. But regardless of how its external form changes, the essence of such a regime remains the same: it never intends to build any value system that can transcend itself.

⸻

Therefore, when economic growth stalls, fiscal crises emerge, population begins to shrink, and the younger generation of society refuses to take on responsibilities, the regime does not attempt real reform, because reform means weakening control. Nor does it try to restore trust, because trust cannot be generated within a structure of fear. The only thing it can do is create an illusion of delay—making society appear still functional, making currency still circulate, making people believe order has not yet collapsed. Meanwhile, core members of the system begin preparing their escape routes: transferring funds, obtaining overseas identities, relocating family members, establishing external assets. These actions are not betrayal, but the result of rational judgment; in a political machine without faith, loyalty has no meaning—only survival does.

⸻

The social effects of this "sinking ship plan" are cascading. The flight of the upper echelon creates panic in the middle layers; the panic of the middle layers leads to powerlessness in the lower layers. When ordinary people discover the entire system has lost its sense of future, they withdraw in their own ways—no longer marrying, no longer bearing children, no longer investing, no longer believing in any long-term promises. The entire nation becomes a population simultaneously in flight: officials fleeing abroad, capital fleeing offshore, young people fleeing into nothingness. What is called "stability" is merely everyone fleeing, yet no one has the ability to break the stalemate of this state.

⸻

From a historical perspective, such scenes are not unfamiliar. The nobility of the Roman Empire transferred their families and wealth to eastern provinces on the eve of the empire's decline; high officials of the Ottoman Empire purchased properties in Europe before the empire's disintegration; before the Soviet Union's collapse, cadres in the KGB system had already established complex networks of overseas assets. These phenomena show that when a regime no longer represents any conviction, only the possession of power, the sole political rationale during its decline is escape. China's current situation is extremely similar to these examples—only on a larger scale and with deeper disguise.

⸻

In such a system, no one will truly die for the nation, nor will anyone live for ideals. The nation is no longer a community, but a relationship of possession: power possesses society, society possesses individuals, individuals possess momentary safety. The behavior of all levels points to the same conclusion—self-preservation first. This is the true meaning of the "sinking ship plan." It is not a secret document, but the natural self-narrative of a faithless system, the only rational choice a society can make after losing meaning.

⸻

When a nation no longer believes in the future, its collapse has already begun. The ship does not sink immediately; it slowly hollows out. Streets still light up, institutions still function, slogans still update, but everything has already lost its weight. Power is fleeing, capital is retreating, language is emptying itself, and only people remain in place—in silence and desolation, watching the hull continue to float, yet knowing it will ultimately sink.